Falcons Scoreboard Mirage (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

16

3

+2

79

3:1

4

1

6.8

-1%

15

19

3

-4

78

6:4

2

0

6.0

-10%

12

20

7

-8

71

3:4

3

0

5.3

-18%

14

19

0

-5

57

0:0

3

0

5.0

-9%

9

20

4

-11

49

1:1

1

0

4.4

-35%

Total

68

94

17

-26

334

13:10

13

1

5.5

-15%

Wisla Krakow Scoreboard Mirage (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

14

2

+13

113

2:3

6

0

8.5

+36%

25

12

5

+13

101

2:1

5

1

8.2

+34%

16

12

10

+4

87

1:0

5

0

6.7

+11%

13

14

8

-1

69

4:3

2

0

5.8

-9%

13

16

4

-3

62

1:6

4

0

4.9

-7%

Total

94

68

29

+26

432

10:13

22

1

6.8

+13%

Teams advantage Mirage (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Falcons vs Wisla Krakow by the Bo3.gg Team

Wisla Krakow on Mirage Analysis

Wisla Krakow demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Wisla Krakow on Mirage were Sobol, who contributed 27 kills, and Goofy, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 9930 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Mirage, Wisla Krakow held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Falcons on Mirage Analysis

Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for Falcons, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Falcons on Mirage included hAdji, who contributed 18 kills, and Maka, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7679 total damage, Falcons couldn't prevent Wisla Krakow from securing victory on Mirage


On the defensive side of Mirage, Falcons struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date