0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.2
5.9
Inferno0.4
Win Rounds
11
16
Inferno0
Kills
87
102
Inferno0
Damage
9.8K
11.09K
Inferno0
Economy
1.39M
1.37M
Inferno29400
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
100%
Mirage
100%
Ancient
F
67%
Nuke
50%
Vertigo
34%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
67%
3
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Vertigo
33%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
0
Mirage
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
2
0
Nuke
100%
1
0
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of Fake dos Cebolas vs CSAesports by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Fake dos Cebolas and CSAesports, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Vertigo, Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by CSAesports. The MVP of this match was pooldolsk.
CSAesports analytics
The team CSAesports secured 32 out of 66 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Inferno. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for CSAesports were swarmy contributed 49 kills and GV contributed 50 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 23650 overall damage.
On the defensive side, CSAesports held their ground firmly, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Fake dos Cebolas analytics
The team Fake dos Cebolas managed to secure 34 out of 66 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Fake dos Cebolas were pooldolsk contributed 50 kills and coxa contributed 42 kills. 23978 of total damage by Fake dos Cebolas could not prevent CSAesports from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Fake dos Cebolas struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments