0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
57%
Inferno
14%
Vertigo
10%
Dust II
7%
Overpass
7%
Mirage
5%
Ancient
1%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
12
Inferno
42%
12
0
Vertigo
30%
10
7
Dust II
57%
7
5
Overpass
60%
5
2
Mirage
33%
6
7
Ancient
56%
16
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
57%
7
4
Inferno
56%
32
0
Vertigo
40%
10
3
Dust II
50%
12
4
Overpass
67%
3
9
Mirage
38%
8
10
Ancient
57%
7
2
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlll
- llwll
Info
Map Analysis of EYEBALLERS vs X by the Bo3.gg Team
X on Inferno Analysis
X demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 0 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for X on Inferno were v1w, who contributed 27 kills, and deb0, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10874 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, X held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
EYEBALLERS on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EYEBALLERS, as they managed to secure 26 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Inferno included sapec, who contributed 25 kills, and Svedjehed, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8913 total damage, EYEBALLERS couldn't prevent X from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments