0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
50%
Ancient
16%
Vertigo
14%
Mirage
13%
Overpass
8%
Dust II
5%
Inferno
5%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
29
Ancient
53%
32
0
Vertigo
50%
20
9
Mirage
27%
15
10
Overpass
71%
17
4
Dust II
55%
11
14
Inferno
55%
29
1
Last 5 maps
Nuke
50%
2
10
Ancient
37%
19
1
Vertigo
64%
25
5
Mirage
40%
15
4
Overpass
63%
27
3
Dust II
60%
25
0
Inferno
50%
24
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwwl
- llwwl
Info
Match analysis of EYEBALLERS vs ALTERNATE aTTaX by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between EYEBALLERS and ALTERNATE aTTaX, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by EYEBALLERS. The MVP of this match was sapec.
EYEBALLERS analytics
The team EYEBALLERS secured 0 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS were sapec contributed 24 kills and flusha contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10751 overall damage.
On the defensive side, EYEBALLERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ALTERNATE aTTaX analytics
The team ALTERNATE aTTaX managed to secure 30 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX were Pdy contributed 25 kills and PANIX contributed 19 kills. 10940 of total damage by ALTERNATE aTTaX could not prevent EYEBALLERS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ALTERNATE aTTaX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments