EXSAD Gaming Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

16

5

+3

87

1:1

4

0

6.6

0%

17

19

5

-2

92

3:1

5

0

6.4

0%

16

18

5

-2

67

6:3

4

0

6.2

0%

14

13

5

+1

72

1:3

4

1

5.9

0%

12

16

5

-4

51

3:1

2

1

5.2

0%

Total

78

82

25

-4

369

14:9

19

2

6.1

0%

Agency Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

15

2

+11

95

2:1

9

1

7.9

0%

20

14

8

+6

97

3:2

5

0

7.1

0%

16

18

7

-2

72

0:1

5

0

5.8

0%

12

13

8

-1

69

2:7

2

0

5.2

0%

8

18

5

-10

51

2:3

1

0

4.7

-31%

Total

82

78

30

+4

384

9:14

22

1

6.1

-31%

Teams advantage Anubis (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of EXSAD Gaming vs Agency by the Bo3.gg Team

Agency on Anubis Analysis

Agency demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Agency on Anubis were kabul, who contributed 26 kills, and MattyMDaKing, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8835 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Agency held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


EXSAD Gaming on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for EXSAD Gaming, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for EXSAD Gaming on Anubis included androxZ, who contributed 19 kills, and Ram0s, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8480 total damage, EXSAD Gaming couldn't prevent Agency from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, EXSAD Gaming struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date