0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.1
5.6
Nuke-0.5
Win Rounds
12
16
Nuke4
Kills
95
88
Nuke-7
Damage
10.1K
9.44K
Nuke-661
Economy
618.15K
610.2K
Nuke-7950
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
100%
Ancient
e
100%
Dust II
e
42%
Mirage
e
33%
Nuke
e
30%
Inferno
0%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
6
Ancient
100%
1
0
Dust II
67%
3
2
Mirage
33%
3
2
Nuke
80%
5
0
Inferno
100%
1
4
Overpass
0%
1
3
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Dust II
25%
4
0
Mirage
0%
3
2
Nuke
50%
6
0
Inferno
100%
1
7
Overpass
0%
0
9
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlww
- wllwl
Info
Match analysis of ex-Marlian vs IN.GAME by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ex-Marlian and IN.GAME, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by IN.GAME. The MVP of this match was Gospadarov.
IN.GAME analytics
The team IN.GAME secured 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for IN.GAME were Gospadarov contributed 28 kills and Xant3r contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9440 overall damage.
On the defensive side, IN.GAME held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ex-Marlian analytics
The team ex-Marlian managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ex-Marlian were nat1ve contributed 24 kills and OWNER contributed 23 kills. 10101 of total damage by ex-Marlian could not prevent IN.GAME from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ex-Marlian struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments