44
77
13
-33
318
6:11
7
2
Anubis5.2
0%
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
41.8164
USP kills on a map
31.6027
Headshots on a map
170.3159
Headshots on a map
14.960.3159
Speed Round (sec)
00:29s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
37831010
Player score (round)
39401010
Player score (round)
41091010
Multikill x-
4
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
e
100%
Inferno
0%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
100%
1
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of ex-Genk vs Power Bears by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ex-Genk and Power Bears, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by ex-Genk. The MVP of this match was Rezst.
ex-Genk analytics
The team ex-Genk secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ex-Genk were Rezst contributed 22 kills and Ayezs contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7874 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ex-Genk held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Power Bears analytics
The team Power Bears managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Power Bears were weaver contributed 12 kills and 21exap contributed 8 kills. 5401 of total damage by Power Bears could not prevent ex-Genk from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Power Bears struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments