0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6
6.1
Dust II0.4
Win Rounds
44
42
Dust II4
Kills
286
288
Dust II5
Damage
31.62K
31.86K
Dust II398
Economy
1.67M
1.72M
Dust II-41650
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
e
100%
Inferno
e
100%
Nuke
67%
Overpass
0%
Vertigo
0%
Mirage
0%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
0
Inferno
100%
1
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Overpass
0%
0
1
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
1
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
4
Inferno
0%
3
0
Nuke
67%
3
0
Overpass
0%
0
2
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Mirage
0%
0
4
Ancient
0%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of ex-Durany vs Malvinas by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ex-Durany and Malvinas, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Dust II, Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by ex-Durany. The MVP of this match was TIKO.
ex-Durany analytics
The team ex-Durany secured 44 out of 86 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Inferno. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ex-Durany were andizin contributed 73 kills and EmaDlz contributed 56 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 31623 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ex-Durany held their ground firmly, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Malvinas analytics
The team Malvinas managed to secure 42 out of 86 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Malvinas were TIKO contributed 68 kills and gAtito contributed 58 kills. 31859 of total damage by Malvinas could not prevent ex-Durany from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Malvinas struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments