0 Comments
100
81
32
+19
405
20:7
23
2
+11%
Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Records Anubis
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:30s
Smoke thrown on a map
2415.0371
Shots (total/round)
8316
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Molotov damage (total/round)
11523.8
Molotov damage (total/round)
9823.8
Molotov damage (total/round)
10023.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Info
Map Analysis of ex-Copenhagen Flames vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
ex-Copenhagen Flames on Anubis Analysis
ex-Copenhagen Flames demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ex-Copenhagen Flames on Anubis were raalz, who contributed 24 kills, and b0RUP, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10940 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, ex-Copenhagen Flames held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
EYEBALLERS on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for EYEBALLERS, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Anubis included Peppzor, who contributed 20 kills, and flusha, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9313 total damage, EYEBALLERS couldn't prevent ex-Copenhagen Flames from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments