Eternal Fire Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

6

6

+12

110

3:1

5

0

7.7

+31%

16

9

5

+7

95

4:1

4

0

7.3

+22%

13

4

6

+9

66

1:1

4

1

6.9

+24%

18

10

3

+8

82

1:3

4

0

6.7

+26%

15

10

3

+5

82

3:1

4

0

6.6

+13%

Total

80

39

23

+41

435

12:7

21

1

7.0

+23%

ESC Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

11

15

3

-4

66

3:4

2

0

5.9

+6%

11

17

2

-6

66

1:1

2

0

5.4

-2%

11

15

3

-4

64

2:3

4

0

5.4

+13%

5

15

1

-10

49

1:0

1

0

4.4

-21%

1

18

2

-17

26

0:4

0

0

2.6

-47%

Total

39

80

11

-41

272

7:12

9

0

4.8

-10%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Eternal Fire vs ESC by the Bo3.gg Team

Eternal Fire on Inferno Analysis

Eternal Fire demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Eternal Fire on Inferno were XANTARES, who contributed 18 kills, and woxic, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8257 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Eternal Fire held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ESC on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ESC, as they managed to secure 3 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ESC on Inferno included fanatic, who contributed 11 kills, and experative, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5177 total damage, ESC couldn't prevent Eternal Fire from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, ESC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date