0 Comments
Teams advantage Vertigo (M1)
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
33%
Mirage
27%
Anubis
21%
Inferno
20%
Nuke
0%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
17%
6
1
Mirage
67%
6
0
Anubis
57%
7
1
Inferno
20%
5
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
3
1
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
50%
4
0
Mirage
40%
5
0
Anubis
78%
9
0
Inferno
0%
0
1
Nuke
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
2
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlll
- wwwwl
Info
Map Analysis of Eternal Fire Academy vs Vaseline Worms by the Bo3.gg Team
Vaseline Worms on Vertigo Analysis
Vaseline Worms demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Vaseline Worms on Vertigo were zweih, who contributed 30 kills, and twizell, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 8100 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Vaseline Worms held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Eternal Fire Academy on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Eternal Fire Academy, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Eternal Fire Academy on Vertigo included Jaex-, who contributed 15 kills, and hey044, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5466 total damage, Eternal Fire Academy couldn't prevent Vaseline Worms from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Eternal Fire Academy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments