0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Anubis
100%
Overpass
40%
Mirage
37%
Ancient
31%
Vertigo
29%
Inferno
12%
Nuke
4%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
1
Anubis
100%
1
6
Overpass
40%
10
1
Mirage
63%
8
0
Ancient
25%
4
4
Vertigo
0%
3
6
Inferno
50%
10
1
Nuke
40%
5
3
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
2
Mirage
100%
6
0
Ancient
56%
9
2
Vertigo
29%
7
0
Inferno
38%
8
0
Nuke
44%
9
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- wwwww
Info
Match analysis of Eternal Fire Academy vs Leo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Eternal Fire Academy and Leo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Eternal Fire Academy. The MVP of this match was jottAAA.
Eternal Fire Academy analytics
The team Eternal Fire Academy secured 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Eternal Fire Academy were jottAAA contributed 30 kills and TR0JN contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9638 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Eternal Fire Academy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Leo analytics
The team Leo managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Leo were muR contributed 19 kills and Merl contributed 16 kills. 7371 of total damage by Leo could not prevent Eternal Fire Academy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Leo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments