0 Comments
77
93
21
-16
334
10:16
17
1
-7%
Teams advantage Mirage (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
54%
Dust II
24%
Overpass
17%
Mirage
15%
Nuke
11%
Inferno
9%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
54%
13
16
Dust II
40%
5
29
Overpass
50%
22
10
Mirage
65%
46
4
Nuke
42%
26
1
Inferno
34%
35
9
Vertigo
50%
16
9
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
3
11
Dust II
64%
14
3
Overpass
33%
3
11
Mirage
50%
30
1
Nuke
53%
17
2
Inferno
25%
20
1
Vertigo
50%
4
8
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlllw
- lwwlw
Info
Map Analysis of eSuba vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
eSuba on Mirage Analysis
eSuba demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 0 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for eSuba on Mirage were M1key, who contributed 26 kills, and Blogg1s, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 10302 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, eSuba held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 26 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Mirage included nEMANHA, who contributed 20 kills, and simke, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8692 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent eSuba from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments