eSuba Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

15

2

+4

77

2:1

5

0

6.6

+3%

17

15

2

+2

70

2:1

4

0

6.1

-2%

10

16

2

-6

56

1:1

1

0

5.1

-11%

8

20

6

-12

61

0:9

2

0

3.9

-35%

6

22

5

-16

40

1:6

1

0

3.5

-45%

Total

60

88

17

-28

304

6:18

13

0

5.0

-18%

Viary Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

8

3

+13

79

2:0

4

1

7.3

+25%

19

15

8

+4

102

4:2

6

1

7.2

+15%

17

11

2

+6

72

3:1

6

0

6.6

+41%

15

14

3

+1

74

6:2

3

0

6.4

+15%

15

12

5

+3

69

3:1

3

0

6.3

+1%

Total

87

60

21

+27

396

18:6

22

2

6.7

+19%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of eSuba vs Viary by the Bo3.gg Team

Viary on Inferno Analysis

Viary demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Viary on Inferno were delifisek, who contributed 21 kills, and Ay7unc, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9498 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Viary held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


eSuba on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for eSuba, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for eSuba on Inferno included Blogg1s, who contributed 19 kills, and Pechyn, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7301 total damage, eSuba couldn't prevent Viary from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, eSuba struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date