Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 damage (avg/round)
62.825.3
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.52
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.72
Player score (round)
38071012
Player score (round)
47831012
Player score (round)
36671012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
60%
Inferno
51%
Vertigo
27%
Ancient
21%
Mirage
19%
Overpass
11%
Nuke
6%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
60%
5
21
Inferno
20%
30
8
Vertigo
38%
16
4
Ancient
38%
21
9
Mirage
56%
36
4
Overpass
43%
7
17
Nuke
46%
28
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
59
Inferno
71%
42
10
Vertigo
65%
26
8
Ancient
59%
22
10
Mirage
37%
27
23
Overpass
54%
35
22
Nuke
40%
25
20
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of eSuba vs SINNERS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between eSuba and SINNERS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Ancient, Mirage, and victory was secured by SINNERS. The MVP of this match was FORSYY.
SINNERS analytics
The team SINNERS secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SINNERS were FORSYY contributed 63 kills and beastik contributed 64 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 31781 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SINNERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
eSuba analytics
The team eSuba managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for eSuba were zur1s contributed 65 kills and Blogg1s contributed 59 kills. 29455 of total damage by eSuba could not prevent SINNERS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, eSuba struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments