Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
124.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
49.516.7
Deagle kills on a map
51.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
18.55.4
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4398
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
14.23.8
AK47 damage (avg/round)
58.325.3
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.42
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
38211012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
54%
Mirage
47%
Nuke
40%
Dust II
25%
Overpass
15%
Ancient
10%
Inferno
3%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
54%
13
8
Mirage
64%
44
4
Nuke
40%
25
0
Dust II
50%
6
24
Overpass
59%
17
10
Ancient
60%
15
13
Inferno
30%
33
8
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
11
Mirage
17%
6
4
Nuke
0%
1
9
Dust II
25%
8
1
Overpass
44%
9
1
Ancient
50%
6
3
Inferno
33%
9
1
Info
Match analysis of eSuba vs Sampi by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between eSuba and Sampi, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Ancient, and victory was secured by eSuba. The MVP of this match was Blogg1s.
eSuba analytics
The team eSuba secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for eSuba were Blogg1s contributed 48 kills and Pechyn contributed 43 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22554 overall damage.
On the defensive side, eSuba held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sampi analytics
The team Sampi managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sampi were MATYS contributed 42 kills and T4GG3D contributed 40 kills. 20657 of total damage by Sampi could not prevent eSuba from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sampi struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments