Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
51.8064
Galil damage (avg/round)
17.75.6
GLOCK kills on a map
51.4398
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
163.8
Deagle damage (avg/round)
16.45.4
M4A4 kills on a map
103.6448
Galil kills on a map
51.8064
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.75.6
Player score (round)
35331012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
100%
Dust II
80%
Inferno
75%
Nuke
30%
Mirage
18%
Vertigo
10%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
2
1
Dust II
0%
0
6
Inferno
0%
2
5
Nuke
20%
5
1
Mirage
22%
9
0
Vertigo
50%
4
1
Ancient
50%
4
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
14
Dust II
80%
5
4
Inferno
75%
4
1
Nuke
50%
10
1
Mirage
40%
5
4
Vertigo
40%
10
0
Ancient
50%
2
3
Info
Match analysis of eSuba vs EXTREMUM by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between eSuba and EXTREMUM, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Vertigo, Mirage, and victory was secured by EXTREMUM. The MVP of this match was jkaem.
EXTREMUM analytics
The team EXTREMUM secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for EXTREMUM were jkaem contributed 67 kills and Liazz contributed 60 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 29726 overall damage.
On the defensive side, EXTREMUM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
eSuba analytics
The team eSuba managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for eSuba were Blogg1s contributed 61 kills and Pechyn contributed 52 kills. 27472 of total damage by eSuba could not prevent EXTREMUM from securing the victory
On the defensive side, eSuba struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments