70
48
33
+22
404
10:7
19
2
+20%
Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
50%
Mirage
e
50%
Anubis
e
28%
Vertigo
e
25%
Nuke
25%
Ancient
3%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
0
Mirage
100%
1
3
Anubis
71%
7
0
Vertigo
50%
4
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Ancient
57%
14
1
Inferno
0%
3
2
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
2
0
Mirage
50%
10
0
Anubis
43%
14
0
Vertigo
25%
8
0
Nuke
25%
4
0
Ancient
60%
25
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- lllwl
Info
Map Analysis of esmagaB vs los kogutos by the Bo3.gg Team
los kogutos on Ancient Analysis
los kogutos demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for los kogutos on Ancient were Nami, who contributed 19 kills, and -_Chudy, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 7264 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, los kogutos held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
esmagaB on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for esmagaB, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for esmagaB on Ancient included prBIm, who contributed 12 kills, and aragornN, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5561 total damage, esmagaB couldn't prevent los kogutos from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, esmagaB struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments