0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
94.491
USP kills on a map
41.6074
Percentage of headshots
38%15%
Player score (round)
38581011
Player score (round)
42601011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
48%
Nuke
38%
Mirage
19%
Inferno
18%
Ancient
13%
Anubis
7%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
29
Nuke
61%
18
6
Mirage
27%
15
6
Inferno
32%
19
2
Ancient
40%
25
2
Anubis
52%
23
6
Dust II
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
48%
23
7
Nuke
23%
22
12
Mirage
46%
41
1
Inferno
50%
4
26
Ancient
53%
43
2
Anubis
45%
22
16
Dust II
0%
0
4
Info
Match analysis of Entropiq vs Nexus by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Entropiq and Nexus, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Entropiq. The MVP of this match was FASHR.
Entropiq analytics
The team Entropiq secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Entropiq were FASHR contributed 21 kills and regali contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7947 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Entropiq held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Nexus analytics
The team Nexus managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Nexus were XELLOW contributed 12 kills and Ciocardau contributed 11 kills. 4904 of total damage by Nexus could not prevent Entropiq from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Nexus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments