0 Comments
186
178
48
+8
391
29:24
44
3
+2%
Teams advantage Ancient (M2)
Records Ancient
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:30s
Headshots (total/map)
228
Smoke thrown on a map
5115.0371
Headshots (total/map)
258
M4A1 kills on a map
314.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
57.816.7
Smoke thrown on a map
5115.0371
Info
Map Analysis of Entropiq vs Copenhagen Flames by the Bo3.gg Team
Copenhagen Flames on Ancient Analysis
Copenhagen Flames demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 28 out of 53 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Ancient were b0RUP, who contributed 45 kills, and birdfromsky, who added 41 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 20727 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Copenhagen Flames held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Entropiq on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Entropiq, as they managed to secure 25 out of 53 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Entropiq on Ancient included Forester, who contributed 45 kills, and mir, who added 41 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 19218 total damage, Entropiq couldn't prevent Copenhagen Flames from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Entropiq struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments