0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
7.6
5.1
Overpass2.4
Win Rounds
16
1
Overpass15
Kills
82
48
Overpass34
Damage
8.27K
5.73K
Overpass2541
Economy
409.55K
307.45K
Overpass102100
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
55%
Ancient
47%
Vertigo
39%
Nuke
38%
Inferno
L
37%
Overpass
29%
Mirage
L
14%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
55%
22
15
Ancient
47%
17
32
Vertigo
39%
23
17
Nuke
38%
26
10
Inferno
38%
26
43
Overpass
62%
39
5
Mirage
43%
35
13
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Inferno
75%
4
0
Overpass
33%
6
0
Mirage
57%
7
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwlw
- lwll
Info
Match analysis of Entropiq vs LookingForOrg EU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Entropiq and LookingForOrg EU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by Entropiq. The MVP of this match was sesL.
Entropiq analytics
The team Entropiq secured 17 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Entropiq were sesL contributed 24 kills and leckr contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8409 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Entropiq held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LookingForOrg EU analytics
The team LookingForOrg EU managed to secure 0 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LookingForOrg EU were SoLb contributed 13 kills and L1GH7n1nG contributed 13 kills. 5731 of total damage by LookingForOrg EU could not prevent Entropiq from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LookingForOrg EU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments