0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
57%
Mirage
35%
Dust II
30%
Vertigo
22%
Inferno
7%
Nuke
3%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
57%
14
1
Mirage
64%
14
2
Dust II
80%
15
0
Vertigo
60%
10
2
Inferno
50%
2
23
Nuke
67%
9
8
Ancient
0%
0
1
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
12
Mirage
29%
7
3
Dust II
50%
8
4
Vertigo
38%
8
6
Inferno
43%
7
8
Nuke
64%
11
2
Ancient
0%
0
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwww
- wllll
Info
Match analysis of Entropiq vs Izako Boars by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Entropiq and Izako Boars, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Entropiq. The MVP of this match was STOMP.
Entropiq analytics
The team Entropiq secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Entropiq were Lack1 contributed 26 kills and Forester contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11025 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Entropiq held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Izako Boars analytics
The team Izako Boars managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Izako Boars were STOMP contributed 21 kills and byali contributed 28 kills. 11077 of total damage by Izako Boars could not prevent Entropiq from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Izako Boars struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments