0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
156.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
71.621.6
M4A1 kills on a map
134.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
57.916.7
Galil kills on a map
51.8064
Galil damage (avg/round)
25.85.6
M4A1 kills on a map
94.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
4616.7
USP kills on a map
31.616
Player score (round)
35661012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
26%
Ancient
22%
Overpass
10%
Dust II
4%
Nuke
4%
Mirage
4%
Inferno
3%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
41%
34
12
Ancient
72%
32
27
Overpass
67%
33
13
Dust II
48%
23
21
Nuke
46%
39
18
Mirage
48%
33
21
Inferno
47%
15
72
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
21
1
Ancient
50%
12
15
Overpass
57%
7
28
Dust II
44%
18
3
Nuke
50%
2
35
Mirage
52%
29
2
Inferno
44%
18
13
Info
Match analysis of Entropiq vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Entropiq and Endpoint, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by Entropiq. The MVP of this match was Forester.
Entropiq analytics
The team Entropiq secured 16 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Entropiq were Forester contributed 22 kills and El1an contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8790 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Entropiq held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Endpoint analytics
The team Endpoint managed to secure 3 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Endpoint were CRUC1AL contributed 14 kills and BOROS contributed 9 kills. 5260 of total damage by Endpoint could not prevent Entropiq from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Endpoint struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments