0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
57%
Overpass
44%
Mirage
28%
Nuke
18%
Vertigo
10%
Inferno
8%
Ancient
2%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
57%
7
17
Overpass
44%
16
4
Mirage
32%
22
5
Nuke
22%
9
12
Vertigo
43%
7
19
Inferno
63%
27
0
Ancient
38%
16
9
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
1
4
Overpass
0%
0
2
Mirage
60%
5
2
Nuke
40%
5
0
Vertigo
33%
6
1
Inferno
71%
7
0
Ancient
40%
10
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llllw
- lwlwl
Info
Match analysis of Enterprise vs Atlantic by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Enterprise and Atlantic, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, Mirage, Anubis, and victory was secured by Enterprise. The MVP of this match was Ryxxo.
Enterprise analytics
The team Enterprise secured 42 out of 86 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Anubis. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Enterprise were Darber contributed 68 kills and MoriiSko contributed 72 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 32295 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Enterprise held their ground firmly, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Atlantic analytics
The team Atlantic managed to secure 44 out of 86 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Atlantic were Ryxxo contributed 77 kills and Zanto contributed 62 kills. 30621 of total damage by Atlantic could not prevent Enterprise from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Atlantic struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments