0 Comments
Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
50%
Vertigo
46%
Dust II
31%
Mirage
20%
Overpass
12%
Inferno
7%
Nuke
4%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
50%
22
18
Vertigo
0%
1
51
Dust II
40%
30
8
Mirage
56%
48
3
Overpass
48%
27
18
Inferno
61%
56
1
Nuke
37%
19
17
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
1
31
Vertigo
46%
13
8
Dust II
71%
28
1
Mirage
76%
29
1
Overpass
60%
10
16
Inferno
54%
26
3
Nuke
33%
12
10
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlww
- wlwwl
Info
Map Analysis of Enterprise vs Iron Branch by the Bo3.gg Team
Enterprise on Dust II Analysis
Enterprise demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 0 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Enterprise on Dust II were h4rn, who contributed 30 kills, and manguss, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 10648 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Enterprise held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Iron Branch on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Iron Branch, as they managed to secure 26 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Iron Branch on Dust II included kensizor, who contributed 22 kills, and t3ns1on, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8238 total damage, Iron Branch couldn't prevent Enterprise from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Iron Branch struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments