Endpoint Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

11

1

+16

107

4:2

9

0

7.9

+38%

20

13

5

+7

80

3:1

4

1

6.9

+10%

22

16

2

+6

82

3:5

7

1

6.3

+10%

16

19

2

-3

66

1:2

4

0

5.5

+4%

14

16

8

-2

68

2:3

5

0

5.5

-3%

Total

99

75

18

+24

403

13:13

29

2

6.4

+12%

PGE Turow Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

20

3

+2

76

3:5

7

0

6.1

+7%

12

18

5

-6

63

3:2

3

1

5.7

-15%

13

19

5

-6

61

3:1

2

1

5.6

-14%

11

20

6

-9

68

1:1

2

0

5.3

-21%

17

22

2

-5

56

3:4

4

0

5.2

-13%

Total

75

99

21

-24

324

13:13

18

2

5.6

-11%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Endpoint vs PGE Turow by the Bo3.gg Team

Endpoint on Anubis Analysis

Endpoint demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Endpoint on Anubis were HeavyGod, who contributed 27 kills, and sl3nd, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10476 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


PGE Turow on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for PGE Turow, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for PGE Turow on Anubis included Markoś, who contributed 22 kills, and darko, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8422 total damage, PGE Turow couldn't prevent Endpoint from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, PGE Turow struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date