Endpoint Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

13

5

+12

101

4:3

7

1

7.9

+49%

20

14

4

+6

81

3:0

4

0

7.0

+15%

16

16

4

0

77

6:2

4

0

6.6

+14%

16

15

9

+1

74

2:2

5

1

6.4

+6%

11

14

1

-3

46

1:2

2

0

4.9

-9%

Total

88

72

23

+16

380

16:9

22

2

6.6

+15%

fnatic Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

17

4

0

91

3:1

3

0

6.4

+3%

18

18

3

0

70

0:4

5

1

5.7

+8%

14

18

4

-4

65

2:4

4

0

5.3

-15%

13

17

2

-4

43

3:2

1

0

5.1

-20%

10

19

4

-9

48

1:5

1

0

4.3

-24%

Total

72

89

17

-17

317

9:16

14

1

5.4

-10%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Endpoint vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team

Endpoint on Inferno Analysis

Endpoint demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Endpoint on Inferno were CRUC1AL, who contributed 25 kills, and flameZ, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9490 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


fnatic on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for fnatic, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for fnatic on Inferno included KRIMZ, who contributed 17 kills, and Golden, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7922 total damage, fnatic couldn't prevent Endpoint from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, fnatic struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date