Endpoint Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

22

6

+3

94

5:2

6

1

7.3

+14%

19

17

10

+2

87

2:2

4

1

6.7

+10%

20

15

4

+5

67

3:0

4

0

6.3

+2%

20

16

3

+4

58

2:3

4

1

5.8

-1%

12

22

8

-10

57

3:7

4

0

4.6

-17%

Total

96

92

31

+4

364

15:14

22

3

6.2

+2%

CYBERSHOKE Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

18

3

+8

89

4:2

7

1

7.3

+15%

21

18

5

+3

77

4:5

6

1

6.4

+1%

18

18

6

0

74

3:2

6

0

6.2

-3%

11

19

13

-8

60

1:0

1

0

5.2

-21%

16

23

5

-7

64

2:6

5

0

5.0

-10%

Total

92

96

32

-4

363

14:15

25

2

6.0

-4%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Endpoint vs CYBERSHOKE by the Bo3.gg Team

Endpoint on Anubis Analysis

Endpoint demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Endpoint on Anubis were cej0t, who contributed 25 kills, and Surreal, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10547 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


CYBERSHOKE on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for CYBERSHOKE, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Anubis included FenomeN, who contributed 26 kills, and lov1kus, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10541 total damage, CYBERSHOKE couldn't prevent Endpoint from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date