0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
134.2536
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
79.916.3
Smoke thrown on a map
1514.1785
Molotov damage (avg/round)
72
USP damage (avg/round)
15.44.9
Galil damage (avg/round)
17.96.1
Player score (round)
35491011
Clutch (opponents)
2
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s







Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Train
33%
Inferno
28%
Anubis
21%
Ancient
13%
Nuke
10%
Dust II
7%
Mirage
4%
Last 5 maps
Train
33%
3
2
Inferno
0%
0
21
Anubis
67%
12
5
Ancient
63%
24
1
Nuke
55%
11
7
Dust II
50%
12
8
Mirage
40%
15
6
Last 5 maps
Train
0%
0
16
Inferno
28%
25
2
Anubis
46%
26
16
Ancient
50%
26
11
Nuke
45%
22
2
Dust II
57%
30
4
Mirage
36%
22
7
Info
Match analysis of ENCE vs Nexus by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ENCE and Nexus, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by ENCE. The MVP of this match was sdy.
ENCE analytics
The team ENCE secured 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ENCE were sdy contributed 18 kills and podi contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6911 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ENCE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Nexus analytics
The team Nexus managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Nexus were s0und contributed 9 kills and XELLOW contributed 8 kills. 3801 of total damage by Nexus could not prevent ENCE from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Nexus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments