0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP damage (avg/round)
13.54.6
AK47 kills on a map
176.732
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.13.8
USP kills on a map
51.616
Player score (round)
40551012
Player score (round)
46361012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Inferno
29%
Mirage
24%
Overpass
13%
Nuke
8%
Ancient
7%
Dust II
6%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
12
7
Inferno
40%
5
31
Mirage
77%
13
5
Overpass
57%
14
14
Nuke
70%
23
2
Ancient
63%
8
4
Dust II
56%
9
17
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
38
Inferno
69%
13
9
Mirage
53%
19
2
Overpass
70%
10
17
Nuke
62%
13
15
Ancient
70%
10
1
Dust II
62%
13
6
Info
Match analysis of ENCE vs MAD Lions by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ENCE and MAD Lions, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by ENCE. The MVP of this match was hades.
ENCE analytics
The team ENCE secured 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ENCE were hades contributed 25 kills and doto contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11063 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ENCE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MAD Lions analytics
The team MAD Lions managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MAD Lions were b0RUP contributed 25 kills and Woro2k contributed 25 kills. 10258 of total damage by MAD Lions could not prevent ENCE from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MAD Lions struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments