Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
113
Deagle kills on a map
51.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
20.85.4
Player score (round)
42761012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
39151012
Player score (round)
38621012
Damage (total/round)
39173
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
47%
Inferno
45%
Mirage
37%
Nuke
21%
Ancient
21%
Overpass
15%
Dust II
12%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
12
8
Inferno
38%
8
25
Mirage
73%
11
7
Nuke
71%
24
1
Ancient
71%
7
2
Overpass
50%
12
14
Dust II
60%
10
18
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
20%
5
25
Inferno
83%
6
9
Mirage
36%
11
12
Nuke
50%
12
5
Ancient
50%
6
12
Overpass
35%
17
5
Dust II
72%
18
0
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of ENCE vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ENCE and HAVU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by HAVU. The MVP of this match was xseveN.
HAVU analytics
The team HAVU secured 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HAVU were xseveN contributed 25 kills and jemi contributed 26 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10227 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HAVU held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ENCE analytics
The team ENCE managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ENCE were Spinx contributed 25 kills and hades contributed 15 kills. 8143 of total damage by ENCE could not prevent HAVU from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ENCE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments