Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:30s
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.43.8
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.52
Player score (round)
35881012
Player score (round)
41201012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
31%
Inferno
29%
Nuke
28%
Mirage
8%
Ancient
7%
Dust II
5%
Vertigo
3%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
13%
8
23
Inferno
0%
0
42
Nuke
65%
23
0
Mirage
42%
12
8
Ancient
40%
10
4
Dust II
55%
11
15
Vertigo
58%
12
7
Last 5 maps
Overpass
44%
9
26
Inferno
29%
7
31
Nuke
37%
19
6
Mirage
50%
18
4
Ancient
33%
3
38
Dust II
50%
24
0
Vertigo
55%
11
9
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of ENCE vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ENCE and BIG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by ENCE. The MVP of this match was valde.
ENCE analytics
The team ENCE secured 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ENCE were valde contributed 23 kills and Maden contributed 25 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10870 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ENCE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BIG analytics
The team BIG managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BIG were k1to contributed 19 kills and tabseN contributed 18 kills. 7556 of total damage by BIG could not prevent ENCE from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments