Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
126.4203
Galil kills on a map
41.8168
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.56
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:12s00:36s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5028
GLOCK kills on a map
51.4516
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
22.84.2
Decoy grenades thrown
31.263
HE damage (avg/round)
13.23.4
Eco wins full buy
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
70%
Anubis
44%
Ancient
20%
Mirage
18%
Vertigo
11%
Nuke
5%
Dust II
1%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
70%
10
1
Anubis
0%
0
26
Ancient
33%
12
13
Mirage
27%
11
12
Vertigo
64%
14
3
Nuke
45%
11
0
Dust II
39%
18
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
17
Anubis
44%
9
3
Ancient
53%
17
2
Mirage
45%
11
7
Vertigo
75%
8
7
Nuke
50%
8
4
Dust II
38%
8
5
Info
Match analysis of AMKAL vs ENCE by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AMKAL and ENCE, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Vertigo, Ancient, Dust II, and victory was secured by ENCE. The MVP of this match was sdy.
ENCE analytics
The team ENCE secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ENCE were sdy contributed 68 kills and xKacpersky contributed 50 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26280 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ENCE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AMKAL analytics
The team AMKAL managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AMKAL were TRAVIS contributed 54 kills and topo contributed 50 kills. 23816 of total damage by AMKAL could not prevent ENCE from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AMKAL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments