0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
67%
Anubis
66%
Mirage
65%
Vertigo
64%
Inferno
53%
Ancient
49%
Nuke
33%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
67%
48
2
Anubis
66%
35
3
Mirage
65%
17
35
Vertigo
64%
14
21
Inferno
53%
36
8
Ancient
49%
45
18
Nuke
33%
3
60
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwww
- lwlww
Info
Map Analysis of eHawks vs ALTERNATE aTTaX by the Bo3.gg Team
ALTERNATE aTTaX on Inferno Analysis
ALTERNATE aTTaX demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX on Inferno were FreeZe, who contributed 16 kills, and PerX, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7509 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, ALTERNATE aTTaX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
eHawks on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for eHawks, as they managed to secure 0 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for eHawks on Inferno included , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, eHawks couldn't prevent ALTERNATE aTTaX from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, eHawks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments