OMiT Scoreboard Ancient (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

5

13

2

-8

61

1:0

1

0

4.7

-28%

7

13

0

-6

44

1:3

2

0

4.2

-30%

4

13

1

-9

36

0:2

0

0

3.6

-52%

2

14

0

-12

49

0:2

1

0

3.4

-46%

3

14

2

-11

43

1:4

1

0

3.2

-51%

Total

21

67

5

-46

234

3:11

5

0

3.8

-42%

E-Xolos LAZER Scoreboard Ancient (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

4

2

+16

135

1:0

8

0

9.1

+61%

13

2

3

+11

85

1:1

3

1

7.7

+52%

13

8

9

+5

114

3:2

2

0

7.5

+28%

13

4

1

+9

79

4:0

3

0

7.4

+35%

8

3

5

+5

76

2:0

2

0

6.5

+18%

Total

67

21

20

+46

490

11:3

18

1

7.7

+39%

Teams advantage Ancient (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of OMiT vs E-Xolos LAZER by the Bo3.gg Team

E-Xolos LAZER on Ancient Analysis

E-Xolos LAZER demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 14 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for E-Xolos LAZER on Ancient were mawth, who contributed 20 kills, and land1n, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 6857 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Ancient, E-Xolos LAZER held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


OMiT on Ancient Analysis

Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for OMiT, as they managed to secure 1 out of 14 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for OMiT on Ancient included obi, who contributed 5 kills, and N20AmZ, who added 7 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 3269 total damage, OMiT couldn't prevent E-Xolos LAZER from securing victory on Ancient


On the defensive side of Ancient, OMiT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date