Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle damage (avg/round)
16.65.4
AWP kills on a map
206.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
66.821.6
Player score (round)
34881012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
39591012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
100%
Dust II
65%
Inferno
62%
Vertigo
50%
Ancient
50%
Overpass
48%
Mirage
37%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
43
Dust II
65%
23
10
Inferno
62%
45
1
Vertigo
50%
18
18
Ancient
50%
22
8
Overpass
48%
27
11
Mirage
63%
56
1
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
1
Inferno
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Ancient
0%
0
2
Overpass
0%
1
0
Mirage
100%
1
0
Info
Match analysis of ECLOT vs TITANS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ECLOT and TITANS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by TITANS. The MVP of this match was oskar.
TITANS analytics
The team TITANS secured 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TITANS were oskar contributed 26 kills and MSL contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11016 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TITANS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ECLOT were Valencio contributed 20 kills and capseN contributed 16 kills. 9207 of total damage by ECLOT could not prevent TITANS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments