0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
116.5888
USP kills on a map
31.6074
AK47 kills on a map
126.5888
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
M4A1 kills on a map
94.491
Trades on a map
7.023.4638
Speed Round (sec)
00:23s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:17s01:55s
Player score (round)
35261011
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
67%
Nuke
55%
Vertigo
42%
Inferno
15%
Anubis
11%
Mirage
8%
Ancient
5%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
33%
3
3
Nuke
55%
38
4
Vertigo
67%
3
26
Inferno
53%
15
6
Anubis
57%
40
10
Mirage
62%
29
7
Ancient
43%
35
15
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
2
0
Nuke
0%
1
10
Vertigo
25%
12
3
Inferno
38%
8
4
Anubis
46%
24
3
Mirage
54%
28
0
Ancient
38%
34
0
Info
Match analysis of ECLOT vs NOM by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ECLOT and NOM, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by ECLOT. The MVP of this match was nbqq.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ECLOT were nbqq contributed 20 kills and Blytz contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8314 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NOM analytics
The team NOM managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NOM were m4tthi contributed 14 kills and MOREE contributed 8 kills. 5434 of total damage by NOM could not prevent ECLOT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NOM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments