Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:25s
Smoke thrown on a map
3414.5022
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
35241010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Rounds win streak
103
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
36%
Vertigo
34%
Ancient
18%
Anubis
9%
Inferno
7%
Nuke
5%
Mirage
3%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
44%
27
9
Vertigo
33%
9
23
Ancient
42%
31
23
Anubis
57%
63
2
Inferno
57%
21
19
Nuke
55%
49
3
Mirage
63%
51
5
Last 5 maps
Dust II
80%
5
0
Vertigo
67%
3
1
Ancient
60%
20
0
Anubis
48%
21
0
Inferno
50%
8
0
Nuke
50%
2
2
Mirage
60%
10
1
Info
Match analysis of ECLOT vs L&G by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ECLOT and L&G, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Anubis, Ancient, Mirage, and victory was secured by ECLOT. The MVP of this match was FORSYY.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT secured 46 out of 90 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Ancient. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ECLOT were FORSYY contributed 84 kills and Dytor contributed 62 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 34863 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
L&G analytics
The team L&G managed to secure 44 out of 90 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 13 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for L&G were OneUn1que contributed 70 kills and kL1okL1o contributed 65 kills. 32075 of total damage by L&G could not prevent ECLOT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, L&G struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments