0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.6074
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Assists on a map
11.974.4098
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Player score (round)
35491011
Player score (round)
35831011
Player score (round)
35831011
Player score (round)
36101011
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
52%
Anubis
51%
Mirage
50%
Inferno
48%
Ancient
43%
Nuke
7%
Vertigo
5%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
52%
29
4
Anubis
51%
37
11
Mirage
50%
26
12
Inferno
48%
21
6
Ancient
43%
30
15
Nuke
60%
30
17
Vertigo
25%
4
26
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
3
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
2
0
Nuke
67%
3
0
Vertigo
20%
5
0
Info
Match analysis of ECLOT vs Genk by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ECLOT and Genk, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Genk. The MVP of this match was Blytz.
Genk analytics
The team Genk secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Genk were Crepow contributed 16 kills and Wumbo contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8511 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Genk held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ECLOT were Blytz contributed 19 kills and nbqq contributed 12 kills. 7306 of total damage by ECLOT could not prevent Genk from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments