Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
12.23.4
M4A1 kills on a map
144.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
79.416.7
USP kills on a map
41.616
USP damage (avg/round)
16.84.6
Smoke thrown on a map
1715.0371
AWP kills on a map
186.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
77.521.6
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:54s
Player score (round)
37751012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
50%
Nuke
50%
Overpass
42%
Mirage
38%
Vertigo
22%
Inferno
14%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
6
6
Nuke
0%
0
22
Overpass
18%
11
2
Mirage
73%
15
0
Vertigo
78%
9
2
Inferno
47%
17
0
Ancient
50%
4
16
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
21
Nuke
50%
14
2
Overpass
60%
5
4
Mirage
35%
20
2
Vertigo
56%
16
1
Inferno
33%
6
13
Ancient
50%
8
6
Info
Match analysis of ECLOT vs eSuba by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ECLOT and eSuba, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Vertigo, Mirage, and victory was secured by eSuba. The MVP of this match was Blogg1s.
eSuba analytics
The team eSuba secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for eSuba were Blogg1s contributed 63 kills and Pechyn contributed 52 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 28322 overall damage.
On the defensive side, eSuba held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ECLOT were Valencio contributed 56 kills and nbqq contributed 51 kills. 25815 of total damage by ECLOT could not prevent eSuba from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments