0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4456
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
40621011
Damage (total/round)
39573
Player score (round)
42961011
Player score (round)
38571011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
63%
Nuke
57%
Inferno
56%
Dust II
50%
Ancient
31%
Anubis
23%
Vertigo
17%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
63%
30
7
Nuke
57%
37
5
Inferno
56%
16
6
Dust II
50%
2
3
Ancient
39%
33
15
Anubis
56%
39
10
Vertigo
50%
4
26
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
4
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Ancient
70%
10
0
Anubis
33%
6
0
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Info
Match analysis of ECLOT vs DASH by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ECLOT and DASH, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by ECLOT. The MVP of this match was FORSYY.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ECLOT were FORSYY contributed 23 kills and nbqq contributed 25 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10061 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DASH analytics
The team DASH managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DASH were Merl contributed 19 kills and cairne contributed 16 kills. 7780 of total damage by DASH could not prevent ECLOT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DASH struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments