Ended
ECLOT
2 - 0
eSuba
Full stats

0 Comments

ECLOT Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

14

7

+13

122

4:1

6

0

8.7

+38%

19

14

6

+5

98

5:0

5

0

7.6

+23%

20

15

3

+5

71

4:1

5

0

6.7

+10%

16

10

4

+6

60

2:0

3

0

6.5

+10%

13

16

4

-3

66

3:4

3

1

5.7

-7%

Total

95

69

24

+26

417

18:6

22

1

7.0

+15%

eSuba Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

20

4

-2

91

1:3

6

0

6.2

+8%

15

18

4

-3

79

3:2

4

0

6.0

-3%

12

18

2

-6

50

0:5

2

1

4.6

-20%

12

21

3

-9

56

0:4

2

0

4.6

-9%

12

19

2

-7

53

2:4

2

0

4.5

-27%

Total

69

96

15

-27

329

6:18

16

1

5.2

-10%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of ECLOT vs eSuba by the Bo3.gg Team

ECLOT on Inferno Analysis

ECLOT demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for ECLOT on Inferno were Dytor, who contributed 27 kills, and K1-FiDa, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10018 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


eSuba on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for eSuba, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for eSuba on Inferno included Levi, who contributed 18 kills, and Blogg1s, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7885 total damage, eSuba couldn't prevent ECLOT from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, eSuba struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date