0 Comments
72
88
26
-16
360
12:11
16
3
0%
Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- —
- Starter
- —
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
59%
Dust II
38%
Mirage
25%
Ancient
7%
Anubis
7%
Nuke
6%
Inferno
1%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
28
Dust II
38%
26
4
Mirage
33%
15
9
Ancient
56%
36
4
Anubis
50%
8
11
Nuke
43%
23
5
Inferno
39%
18
12
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
59%
32
2
Dust II
0%
1
41
Mirage
58%
36
15
Ancient
63%
32
15
Anubis
57%
30
4
Nuke
37%
35
29
Inferno
38%
24
28
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllwl
- lwwwl
Info
Map Analysis of Dusty Roots vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
Sharks on Ancient Analysis
Sharks demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Sharks on Ancient were doc, who contributed 24 kills, and rdnzao, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 9590 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Dusty Roots on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Dusty Roots, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Dusty Roots on Ancient included maxxkor, who contributed 18 kills, and OwensinhoM, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8274 total damage, Dusty Roots couldn't prevent Sharks from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Dusty Roots struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments