0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5.7
6.2
Dust II0.5
Win Rounds
13
16
Dust II3
Kills
90
100
Dust II10
Damage
10.21K
11.23K
Dust II1025
Economy
585.15K
637.9K
Dust II52750
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
50%
Inferno
48%
Ancient
41%
Mirage
36%
Dust II
35%
Nuke
D
28%
Vertigo
D
25%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
50%
14
1
Inferno
48%
27
5
Ancient
41%
22
0
Mirage
36%
22
2
Dust II
35%
17
8
Nuke
22%
9
8
Vertigo
75%
4
5
Info
Match analysis of Dripmen vs Lilmix by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Dripmen and Lilmix, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by Lilmix. The MVP of this match was hns.
Lilmix analytics
The team Lilmix secured 29 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Lilmix were hns contributed 22 kills and Jackinho contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11233 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Lilmix held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Dripmen analytics
The team Dripmen managed to secure 0 out of 29 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Dripmen were Frazehh contributed 23 kills and Extinct contributed 25 kills. 10137 of total damage by Dripmen could not prevent Lilmix from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Dripmen struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments