Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
P
100%
Ancient
80%
Nuke
P
60%
Anubis
P
50%
Dust II
0%
Inferno
0%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
3
0
Ancient
80%
5
0
Nuke
40%
5
0
Anubis
50%
4
1
Dust II
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
1
3
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Nuke
100%
1
0
Anubis
100%
1
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llllw
- wlllw
Info
Map Analysis of Dreams To Legends vs Part Timers by the Bo3.gg Team
Part Timers on Mirage Analysis
Part Timers demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Part Timers on Mirage were , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, Part Timers held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Dreams To Legends on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for Dreams To Legends, as they managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Dreams To Legends on Mirage included , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, Dreams To Legends couldn't prevent Part Timers from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, Dreams To Legends struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments