Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
W
100%
Ancient
D
80%
Mirage
D
44%
Dust II
0%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
0
Ancient
80%
5
0
Mirage
44%
9
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Inferno
100%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Anubis
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Inferno
100%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwll
- wlwww
Info
Map Analysis of DoomGG vs Waterboarding Fan Club by the Bo3.gg Team
DoomGG on Ancient Analysis
DoomGG demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for DoomGG on Ancient were Civil, who contributed 16 kills, and cled, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 8634 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, DoomGG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Waterboarding Fan Club on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Waterboarding Fan Club, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Waterboarding Fan Club on Ancient included stazzz416, who contributed 22 kills, and sathsea, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8875 total damage, Waterboarding Fan Club couldn't prevent DoomGG from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Waterboarding Fan Club struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments