0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
51.8161
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4429
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4429
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
35691011
Player score (round)
38671011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Clutch (opponents)
2
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
D
100%
Ancient
D
100%
Mirage
T
10%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
0
Ancient
100%
1
0
Mirage
40%
5
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Mirage
50%
2
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllww
- wwllw
Info
Match analysis of DoomGG vs TracksuitGaming by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between DoomGG and TracksuitGaming, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by DoomGG. The MVP of this match was -AGB-.
DoomGG analytics
The team DoomGG secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for DoomGG were -AGB- contributed 23 kills and temper contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9297 overall damage.
On the defensive side, DoomGG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
TracksuitGaming analytics
The team TracksuitGaming managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for TracksuitGaming were volcanB contributed 21 kills and Panic contributed 16 kills. 7469 of total damage by TracksuitGaming could not prevent DoomGG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, TracksuitGaming struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments