0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5.1
7.1
Mirage1.9
Win Rounds
6
13
Mirage7
Kills
53
76
Mirage23
Damage
5.82K
7.76K
Mirage1941
Economy
338.75K
440.9K
Mirage102150
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
51.8171
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4456
Openning kills on a map
7.032.8624
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Player score (round)
37751011
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
50%
Overpass
0%
Nuke
0%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
50%
4
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
1
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwwl
- w
Info
Match analysis of Doodlebob vs ASCEND by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Doodlebob and ASCEND, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by ASCEND. The MVP of this match was Zoker.
ASCEND analytics
The team ASCEND secured 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ASCEND were Zoker contributed 18 kills and sh1rax contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7759 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ASCEND held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Doodlebob analytics
The team Doodlebob managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Doodlebob were Sway contributed 13 kills and pengnax contributed 11 kills. 5818 of total damage by Doodlebob could not prevent ASCEND from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Doodlebob struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments