0 Comments
68
38
28
+30
432
8:9
16
1
+24%
Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
67%
Anubis
64%
Mirage
60%
Ancient
54%
Vertigo
50%
Nuke
33%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
67%
3
6
Anubis
64%
11
0
Mirage
60%
5
3
Ancient
54%
13
3
Vertigo
50%
6
0
Nuke
33%
3
1
Inferno
0%
1
11
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwwl
Info
Map Analysis of Denial vs VP.Prodigy by the Bo3.gg Team
VP.Prodigy on Ancient Analysis
VP.Prodigy demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for VP.Prodigy on Ancient were Something, who contributed 16 kills, and KusMe, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 7338 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, VP.Prodigy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Denial on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Denial, as they managed to secure 0 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Denial on Ancient included , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, Denial couldn't prevent VP.Prodigy from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Denial struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments