0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.53.8
Galil kills on a map
91.8064
Galil damage (avg/round)
34.15.6
AUG damage (avg/round)
32.48.1
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
12.53.4
M4A4 kills on a map
113.6448
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
53.312.7
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
HE damage (total/round)
9626.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
76%
Inferno
67%
Nuke
60%
Overpass
56%
Vertigo
54%
Ancient
50%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
76%
21
3
Inferno
67%
21
8
Nuke
60%
20
7
Overpass
56%
16
7
Vertigo
54%
24
5
Ancient
50%
6
10
Mirage
0%
2
43
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
1
Nuke
0%
0
2
Overpass
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
1
1
Ancient
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
1
Info
Match analysis of DBL PONEY vs ex-100PG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between DBL PONEY and ex-100PG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by DBL PONEY. The MVP of this match was afro.
DBL PONEY analytics
The team DBL PONEY secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for DBL PONEY were afro contributed 20 kills and bodyy contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9225 overall damage.
On the defensive side, DBL PONEY held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ex-100PG analytics
The team ex-100PG managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ex-100PG were smiley contributed 9 kills and icem4N contributed 9 kills. 4633 of total damage by ex-100PG could not prevent DBL PONEY from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ex-100PG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments